- Author
- Posted by davidcrespo.bsky.social
- Published
- 29 April 2026
- Kind
- Short Bluesky thread linking two GitHub gists
- Original
- bsky.app/profile/davidcrespo.bsky.social/post/3mko4q2llzk2l
- Subject
- Writing with models
What it is
The poster shares a rewrite of an essay on AI economics. The linked note explains the prompts used. A second post links a chat asking Claude whether the rewrite holds up.
What it says
- The post says the revised economics essay cost about $8 to produce.
- A linked note says two coding agents rewrote Ed Zitron's April 28 essay.
- A follow-up says the poster asked Claude if the argument is persuasive. Claude called it persuasive on its narrow claim but listed seven holes.
What evidence it gives
The thread offers a cost figure and the prompts used. The linked chat shows Claude listing seven weaknesses in the rewritten argument. A later post in the thread shows one weakness as an image caption.
Interests and limits
The thread is short and has no stated aim beyond sharing. The poster does not say what the essay's thesis was worth. A model critiquing a model rewrite is not an independent check. The two linked gists were only partly read.