Human Judgment as a Specification

A tool that recovers intent by asking people about concrete disagreements.

Author
Brown PLT blog
Published
9 June 2026
Kind
Research group blog post, describing a tool and paper
Original
blog.brownplt.org/2026/06/09/pick.html
Subject
Checkable specs for coding agents
Themes
Taste and judgment, Saying it exactly

What it is

This post describes PICK, a tool for getting formal specifications from vague intent. A model proposes several candidates. PICK shows concrete cases where they disagree, and the user votes on each. Candidates that conflict with the votes drop out.

What it says

What evidence it gives

The post says experiments show it works very well, and cites an ECOOP 2026 paper. It gives no numbers itself, and this page has not checked the paper. PICK exists for regular expressions, temporal logic and access control.

Interests and limits

The authors built the tool. It needs formal languages where the difference between candidates can be expressed and sampled. That excludes specs written as ordinary prose.

Connections

These links are this wiki's own reading, not claims the sources make.